Audacity is a popular, free and open-source audio editor available cross-platform.
While this was a good thing considering Audacity’s future growth with all the extended resources after the acquisition, it is turning out to be a nightmare. Why?
After Muse Group bought Audacity, they have managed to spark multiple controversies. To put it in an organized timeline, here’s what it looks like:
- Proposed adding new telemetry features which potentially violated privacy and then dropped the plan after backlash.
- Introduced a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) as one of the steps to change the license
Here’s What Happened: Overview
As one of the go-to audio editing tools for beginners and professionals, Audacity is something important for the users and the open-source community.
As far as I’m aware, a CLA may give the project maintainer rights to reuse/re-license a contributor’s work and use it in a closed-source software.
Officially, they clarify that this is going to supercharge the development of Audacity. But many of the contributors do not seem to agree with it and suggest better ways to monetize Audacity, if that is the goal of Muse group.
For a software, data collection practices can vary depending on what they want to know to improve their product.
But, with whom they share that data with is more important.
This introduces the fact that they may share your personal data with any third-party they work with.
Not just limited to this, they also added a restriction that this software is not meant for individuals below 13 years of age (kids). I don’t see any reason for that.
Also, it violates the GPL license, which should not prevent usage of the software.
So your IP address will be tracked even if you are using an offline audio editor—is that even necessary?
And there’s no going back from that.
By the time you are reading this, they may have updated it as well.
Choosing Audacity’s Fork Instead of Audacity
Now, after the fiasco, there’s a fork, which is gaining attention and the community may end up going forward with it.
The Audacity fork has not yet been concluded with a name. But it aims to revert all the changes influenced by Muse group.
The fork may not be ready for prime time with binary packages available for common users, but you can build it from source.
While it is still something in progress, the fork already has 1.7k stars at the time of writing this. It is only a matter of time that the fork gets more attention than the original project.
What are your thoughts on Audacity’s latest fiasco? Do you want to support the original Audacity tool bought by Muse group or are you in favor of the new fork?