Google and privacy concerns, a match made in heaven? 🔒
Well, I do not intend to make any false claims here. But Google does not have the best reputation regarding privacy protections.
It may not be bad for everyone, but they're not good at it either.
In 2019, Google's Go (open-source programming language) latest release introduced a change where GOPROXY defaults to a mirror operated by Google and is subject to Google's privacy policy.
Now, about the news story for the present:
Google's Go programming language is under the crosshair of various developers when Russ Cox, an engineer at Google, proposed a change for its toolchain to adopt telemetry by default 📊
While the idea behind the proposal may not be wrong, the current idea planned may scare off developers from using the Go programming language in any future project.
What is the suggestion?
Russ aims to introduce a "Transparent Telemetry" concept to help open-source projects get more insights into the software, keeping privacy in mind.
In his blog posts (a series of 3 articles), he mentions that surveys and bug reports are insufficient. So, there is a need to introduce the easiest way to collect data on an app's usage (i.e., telemetry) while keeping things open to everyone.
This means that the entire process of collecting the data, how it is processed, and what happens with it is open to everyone.
Not bad, I guess? 😕
📰 So, what's the catch? Why is the discussion locked at the time of publishing this?
Well, the current proposal plans to add telemetry with an opt-out option. In other words, the telemetry is enabled by default unless someone explicitly disables it.
While that is a terrible choice for a privacy-respecting concept, what makes it worse is Google's association with the project.
Google may end up processing some information with the telemetry.
Yes, as the proposal is open for discussion, one may think every concern should be resolved before proceeding.
However, what if Google internally made this decision? Well, we do not know for sure. But, if that is the case, it would be bad news for projects using the Go programming language.
The solution proposed for this debacle:
Even though some support the idea, it is safe to say - most do not. To consider this, one of the suggestions includes making it an opt-in instead of an opt-out by default.
So, if someone wants to share the data, they can choose to enable the telemetry. If not, it would remain disabled by default.
⭐ My take on this: An opt-in is an excellent way to implement this.
However, if an opt-out measure goes ahead regardless, it would be crucial to keep an eye on the information planned for collection and how to make sure it will be anonymous data that Google will not have access to.
💬 Tell us what you think about this proposal in the comments below.
Here's why you should opt for It's FOSS Plus Membership
- Even the biggest players in the Linux world don't care about desktop Linux users. We do.
- We don't put content behind paywall. Your support keeps it open for everyone. Think of it like 'pay it forward'.
- Don't like ads? With the Plus membership, you get an ad-free reading experience.
- When millions of AI-generated content is being published daily, you read and learn from real human Linux users.
- It costs just $2 a month, less than the cost of your favorite burger.
